| Violence & Evolution
Violence is a tool that allows survival.
Love-Wisdom is a better tool for most situations.
But rarely we may need violence.
we are wired to be
particularly interested in bad guys and horror, because it helps guide
us to survive and/or defeat such a threat.
Usually we can find social solutions to such scenarios.
But, as a human and an
animal, we may need
violence as a tool for survival.
When faced with asocial violent scenarios,
the types where people run from rather than gather around to see who
wins, violence may be the only intelligent response.
This is not
about ego-threats, insults or pub brawls.
This is about life or body threatening situations, where there is no
Learn more about this practical tool here
Here are some
insights from an interview with neuroscientist Dr Doug
Fields (posted 23 February 2016, accessed 26
are all wired for violence, we need it as a species, to protect ourself
makes us snap is not a sense of immorality or any mental defect, but an
evolutionary neurological process.
area of the brain involved is called the attack region of the brain. It
an unconscious/subconscious area: the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus
controls things like sexual behaviour, hunger and thirst.
neurons in the attack region will cause a caged animal to launch an
kill another animal.
have a threat detection part in our brain. It can cause us to risk our
an instant. It is not conscious or deliberate. 99% of the time it works
but the modern world can confuse it, causing misfires. When it works
is called quick thinking or heroism. Men and women have it, but women
likely to use it because of their smaller size. This makes a difference
threat detection brain circuitry and responses. Women are much better
detecting intentions from facial expressions, and so avoiding danger.
are more likely to snap.
from article The Return of the Brutal Savage and the Science
for War by Stephen
Corry of Survival International
(posted 8 April 2016, accessed 17 April 2016):-
last few years have seen an alarming increase in claims that tribal
have been shown to be more violent than we are. This is supposed to
our ancestors were also brutal savages. Such a message has profound
implications for how we view human nature – whether or not we
see war as innate
to the human condition and so, by extension, broadly unavoidable. It
underpins how industrialized society treats those it sees as
reality though it’s nothing more than an old colonialist
once again as “science.” There’s no
evidence to support it.
truth is that there are some tribal peoples who have a belligerent
others known for avoiding violence as much as possible, and lots in
That’s nothing to do with any grasping at mythic noble
savages, it’s what
anthropologists have actually found.
the growing mythology, the archeological
record reveals very little evidence of past violence
either (until the growth of big settlements, starting around 10,000
of the other “proof” for the brutal savage advanced
by Steven Pinker, Jared
Diamond, and other champions of Chagnon, is rife with the selection and
manipulation of facts to fit a desired conclusion. To call this
both laughable and dangerous. These men are desperate to persuade us
they’ve got “proof” for their opinions,
which isn’t surprising as they’re
nothing more – opinions based on a narrow and essentially
political point of view. They have proved nothing, except to those who
believe them. Does it matter? Yes, very much. How we think of tribal
dictates how we treat them. Proponents of Chagnon seek to reestablish
of the brutal savage which once underpinned colonialism and its land
It’s an essentially racist fiction which belongs in the
19th century and,
like a flat earth, should have been discarded generations ago.
It’s the myth at
the heart of the destruction of tribal peoples and it must be
not just deadly for tribal peoples: It’s dangerous for all of
us. False claims
that killing is a proven key factor in our evolution are used to
ennoble, the savagery inherent in today’s world. The brutal
savage may be a
largely invented creature among tribal peoples, but he is certainly
and visibly real much closer to home.
Violence & The Truth